Columbia Fish and Game Association

Pennsylvania: Attack on Concealed Carry to be Voted on Tomorrow!
 
                                                Tuesday, June 29, 2010
 

Please Contact the Members of the House Judiciary Committee Immediately!

 

On Wednesday, June 30, the House Judiciary Committee will VOTE on legislation restricting the recognition of reciprocity agreements for “concealed carry” license holders in Pennsylvania. 

 

House Bill 2536, introduced by State Representative Brian Lentz (D-161), would prohibit a resident of the Commonwealth from carrying a concealed firearm with a license issued from another state.

This legislation is the first step in an outright attack on your concealed carry rights in Pennsylvania.  HB2536 poses a very real and serious threat to our rights so it is imperative that you make your voice heard. 

 

Please contact the members of the House Judiciary Committee IMMEDIATELY and respectfully urge them to oppose HB2536.   Contact information for the committee can be found by clicking here.
 

Copyright 2010, National Rifle Association of America, Institute for Legislative Action.
This may be reproduced. It may not be reproduced for commercial purposes.
11250 Waples Mill Road, Fairfax, VA 22030    800-392-8683 
Contact Us | Privacy & Security Policy

Statement by Wayne LaPierre Executive Vice President, NRA and Chris W. Cox Executive Director, NRA-ILA Regarding U.S. Supreme Court Decision McDonald v. City of Chicago

Monday, June 28, 2010

Today marks a great moment in American history. This is a landmark decision. It is a vindication for the great majority of American citizens who have always believed the Second Amendment was an individual right and freedom worth defending.

The Supreme Court said what a majority of the American public believes. The people who wrote the Second Amendment said it was an individual right, and the Court has now confirmed what our founding fathers wrote and intended. The Second Amendment -- as every citizen’s constitutional right -- is now a real part of American Constitutional law.

But, Supreme Court decisions have to lead to actual consequences or the whole premise of American constitutional authority collapses. Individual freedom must mean you can actually experience it. An incorporated freedom has to be a real freedom.

The intent of the founding fathers -- and the Supreme Court -- was to provide access. Words must have meaning.

The Supreme Court has now said the Second Amendment is an individual freedom for all. And that must have meaning. This decision must provide relief to law-abiding citizens who are deprived of their Second Amendment rights.

We are practical guys. We don’t want to win on philosophy and lose on freedom. The end question is, can law-abiding men and women go out and buy and own a firearm? Today the Supreme Court said yes – anywhere they live!

This decision cannot lead to different measures of freedom, depending on what part of the country you live in. City by city, person by person, this decision must be more than a philosophical victory. An individual right is no right at all if individuals can’t access it. Proof of Heller and McDonald will be law abiding citizens, one by one, purchasing and owning firearms.

The NRA will work to ensure this constitutional victory is not transformed into a practical defeat by activist judges, defiant city councils, or cynical politicians who seek to pervert, reverse, or nullify the Supreme Court’s McDonald decision through Byzantine labyrinths of restrictions and regulations that render the Second Amendment inaccessible, unaffordable, or otherwise impossible to experience in a practical, reasonable way.

What good is a right without the gun? What good is the right if you can’t buy one? Or keep one in your home? Or protect your family with one?

Here’s a piece of paper – protect yourself. That’s no right at all!

Victory is when law abiding men and women can get up, go out, and buy and own a firearm. This is a monumental day. But NRA will not rest until every law-abiding American citizen is able to exercise the individual right to buy and own a firearm for self defense or any other lawful purpose.

NRA-Backed Second Amendment Enforcement Act Introduced in U.S. Congress

Tuesday, April 27, 2010


 

Fairfax, Va. - The National Rifle Association announced its support for critical legislation being introduced in Congress today by Senators John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Jon Tester (D-Mont.), and Representatives Travis Childers (D-Miss.) and Mark Souder (R-Ind.). The Second Amendment Enforcement Act will restore Second Amendment rights to residents of the District of Columbia. This legislation is necessary because the D.C. Council continues to circumvent the Supreme Court’s historic 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. Heller.

Chris W. Cox, executive director of the NRA Institute for Legislative Action, said, “It’s a shame that this legislation is even necessary to restore rights that citizens of the District should already have the freedom to exercise. We are grateful that a bipartisan group of members of Congress led by Senators McCain and Tester, and Congressmen Childers and Souder, have taken this significant step to require the D.C. Council to abide by the Heller decision and allow law-abiding citizens in D.C. to protect themselves and their loved ones.”

The Second Amendment Enforcement Act seeks to secure for District residents the rights reinforced by the Supreme Court’s decision in Heller. The legislation would repeal D.C.'s ban on many common semi-automatic firearms, restore the right of self-defense in the home, authorize purchases of firearms and ammunition by D.C. residents, repeal the District's burdensome gun registration requirement and ensure that firearms may be transported and carried for legitimate purposes.

“Since the Heller ruling, the D.C. Council has willfully disregarded the intentions of our nation’s highest court,” Cox continued. “NRA remains committed to restoring the right to self-defense for law-abiding citizens in Washington, D.C. by whatever legal or legislative means necessary.”

The legislation introduced today is similar to the Ensign Amendment adopted by the Senate in 2009, and to the Childers Amendment that passed the House in 2008. Both measures passed their respective chambers with broad bi-partisan majorities.

More Guns Being Sold
And Fewer Crimes Committed



The passionate anti-gun crowd would have folks believe that heightened momentum nationally toward open-carry and concealed-carry laws is 1) merely a ploy on the part of the firearms industry to sell more product and/or 2) an open invitation to more, rather than less, violent crime.

Statistics lend a certain credence — if not outright cause-and-effect — to the former contention, but a recent report published by (of all people) the gang at MSNBC.com thoroughly disputes the latter notion. In the past decade, as more and more states liberalized gun laws in favor of open-carry and concealed-carry permits, the rate of firearm-related homicides has fallen — and dramatically so — rather than risen.

The numbers are illustrative. As the MSNBC report indicated, Americans in the 1980s and ’90s were killed by guns at a rate of 5.66 per every 100,000 of population. Since 2000, or ever since the increase in open-carry and concealed-carry statutes, this rate has fallen 28 percent to 4.07 per 100,000.

What’s more, this reduction has transpired as the number of guns legally purchased has jumped, again dramatically. The amount of weapons sold remained constant, at between 8.5 million and 9 million annually, in the period 1999-2005. But, starting in 2006, this number jumped an astounding 55 percent — from 10 million that year to more than 14 million in 2009.

Thus, more guns do not translate into more deaths from gun use. In fact, just the opposite has happened. Of decidedly greater significance is the nature of laws on the books pertinent to ownership of weapons.

A classic point-counterpoint: The District of Columbia has the highest gun-homicide rate — 20.50 deaths per 100,000 in population. The district also boasts one of America’s most restrictive gun-control laws. The lowest gun-homicide rate can be found in Utah, at 1.12 deaths per 100,000 people. Not surprisingly, Utah also sports one of the country’s least-stringent series of gun laws, not to mention a widely acclaimed mandatory firearm safety course for all legal gun-owners.

Firearms in the legal possession of law-abiding Americans need not translate into more violence. In fact, as the MSNBC report clearly suggests, the precise converse holds in states that hold Second Amendment rights dear. These statistics don’t lie, and so a case can be made that a well-armed citizenry means fewer, rather than more, murders, robberies, and rapes.

NRA Hunters Rights
cfggrounds/NRAHR.org.jpg

HOMEMEMBERS BULLETIN BOARDCLUB INFORMATIONCALENDAR OF EVENTSTRAPINDOOR ARCHERY3-D ARCHERYJUNIOR RIFLE PROGRAMBLACK POWDERSMALLBORE RIFLE TEAMEDUCATION AND TRAININGLEGISLATIVE NEWSMEMBERSHIP INFOFACILITIES AND RANGES